Showing posts with label Apple. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Apple. Show all posts

Monday, January 16, 2012

Worm steals more than 45,000 Facebook logins

A nasty bit of malware making the rounds on Facebook has reportedly made off with the usernames and passwords of more than 45,000 users.


Most of those affected by the worm--called Ramnit--are from France and the United Kingdom, according to a bulletin issued by security researchers at Seculert. It is capable of infecting Windows executables, Microsoft Office, and HTML files, according to McAfee.

"We suspect that the attackers behind Ramnit are using the stolen credentials to log-in to victims' Facebook accounts and to transmit malicious links to their friends, thereby magnifying the malware's spread even further," Securlet said in its bulletin. "In addition, cybercriminals are taking advantage of the fact that users tend to use the same password in various web-based services (Facebook, Gmail, Corporate SSL VPN, Outlook Web Access, etc.) to gain remote access to corporate networks."

The worm was first discovered in April 2010 stealing sensitive information such as stored FTP credentials and browser cookies. In August 2011, after malware developers borrowed source code from the Zeus botnet, Ramnit "went financial." With that added strength, Ramnit was able to "gain remote access to financial institutions, compromise online banking sessions and penetrate several corporate networks." Approximately 800,000 machines were infected between September 2011 and the end of the year.

The security researcher has notified Facebook and provided the social-networking giant with all the stolen credentials found on Ramnit's server.

Source-cnet

Top 50 high PR Keyword on last December

asbestos attorney washington
criminal attorney clearwater
car crash lawyer sacramento
chicago birth injury lawyers
lemon law attorneys california
fort worth dwi attorney
buyer of structured settlement payments
mesothelioma law firms
alan baum
asbestos attorney ohio
arizona attorney dui
arizona dui attorney
accident attorney car sacramento
no win no fee claims
dallas dwi attorneys
water damage los angeles
federal government student loan consolidation
attorney injury michigan personal
michigan personal injury attorney
student loan consolidation interest rates
federal loan consolidation department
sell structured settlements
car accident lawyers georgia
georgia car accident lawyers
student consolidation loan information
studen loan consolidation
arizona dui lawyer
california car charity donate
houston mesothelioma lawyers
mesothelioma lawyers houston



Source-itechee












































Sunday, January 15, 2012

Bloomberg: iPad 3 To Have Quad-Core CPU, LTE, High-Def Screen

You’ve just got to love the timing. First, Apple announces their education-focused media event smack dab in the middle of CES. Now, just as CES is winding down, Bloomberg has “three people familiar with the product” spilling purported details on the next iPad. Whether or not Apple won CES without even being there, they’re certainly trying.

None of the leaked details are particularly new, but that it comes from Bloomberg and they’ve seemingly got full confidence in their source(s) makes them a bit more credible than rumors prior.

Here’s the gist of it:

    The next iPad (Bloomberg calls it “iPad 3″, though even that detail is of course unconfirmed) is said to have gone into production this month, with production ramping up until February, with a launch in March.
    It’ll have a quad-core CPU (as opposed to the dual-core A5 found in iPad 2)
    It’ll have a “high-def” screen
    Support for LTE (4G)

The most curious bit? The use of the phrase “high-def” instead of “Retina” with regards to the display. If Apple was throwing around the “Retina” term internally, at least one of Bloomberg’s three sources presumably would’ve thought to mention it. If the sources mentioned it, Bloomberg would have squeezed it into the article somewhere — and they didn’t. With leaks like this, what’s not said can be as important as what is. Higher-res screen? Yes. But the absurdly high-resolution that a “retina” iPad would require (something like 2560 x 1920, higher than any monitor Apple has ever made regardless of size)? Probably not.

Source-techcrunch